↓ Skip to main content

RNA Processing

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: RNA Processing
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
RNA Processing
Chapter number 8
Book title
RNA Processing
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-29073-7_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-929071-3, 978-3-31-929073-7
Authors

Washburn, Michael C, Hundley, Heather A, Michael C. Washburn, Heather A. Hundley, Washburn, Michael C., Hundley, Heather A.

Abstract

RNA editing is a cellular process used to expand and diversify the RNA transcripts produced from a generally immutable genome. In animals, the most prevalent type of RNA editing is adenosine (A) to inosine (I) deamination catalyzed by the ADAR family. Throughout development, A-to-I editing levels increase while ADAR expression is constant, suggesting cellular mechanisms to regulate A-to-I editing exist. Furthermore, in several disease states, ADAR expression levels are similar to the normal state, but A-to-I editing levels are altered. Therefore, understanding how these enzymes are regulated in normal tissues and misregulated in disease states is of profound importance. This chapter will both discuss how to identify A-to-I editing sites across the transcriptome and explore the mechanisms that regulate ADAR editing activity, with particular focus on the diverse types of RNA-binding proteins implicated in regulating A-to-I editing in vivo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Other 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,718,998
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,171
of 5,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,046
of 396,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#194
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.