You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Isolation of Mouse Dendritic Cell Subsets and Macrophages from the Skin.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 9 |
| Book title |
Dendritic Cell Protocols
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3606-9_9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3604-5, 978-1-4939-3606-9
|
| Authors |
Camille Malosse, Sandrine Henri, Malosse, Camille, Henri, Sandrine |
| Editors |
Elodie Segura, Nobuyuki Onai |
| Abstract |
The improvement of dendritic cell subset isolation from tissues and the use of appropriate surface markers allowed to decipher their heterogeneity but also allowed to unravel some specific functions that are valuable for vaccine design as well as for a better understanding of the in situ pathophysiology upon infection. Here, we describe the procedures to extract those cells from the skin and to analyze them by flow cytometry using a combination of appropriate surface markers allowing further transcriptomic analysis and functional assays. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 26% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#15,848,630
of 23,548,905 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,543
of 13,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,810
of 396,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#553
of 1,472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,548,905 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.