↓ Skip to main content

Dendritic Cell Protocols

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Dendritic Cell Protocols'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Review of Mouse and Human Dendritic Cell Subsets.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 In Vitro Generation of Human XCR1(+) Dendritic Cells from CD34(+) Hematopoietic Progenitors.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Derivation and Utilization of Functional CD8(+) Dendritic Cell Lines.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Dendritic Cell Protocols
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Isolation and Enrichment of Large Numbers of Highly Purified Mouse Spleen Dendritic Cell Populations and Their In Vitro Equivalents.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Dendritic Cell Subset Purification from Human Tonsils and Lymph Nodes.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Isolation and Identification of Conventional Dendritic Cell Subsets from the Intestine of Mice and Men.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Isolation of Human Skin Dendritic Cell Subsets.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Isolation of Mouse Dendritic Cell Subsets and Macrophages from the Skin.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Isolation of Conventional Dendritic Cells from Mouse Lungs.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Purification of Human Dendritic Cell Subsets from Peripheral Blood.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Protocols for the Identification and Isolation of Antigen-Presenting Cells in Human and Mouse Tissues.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Measurement of Export to the Cytosol in Dendritic Cells Using a Cytofluorimetry-Based Assay.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Dendritic Cell Protocols
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Dendritic Cell Protocols
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Dendritic Cell Protocols
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Dendritic Cell Protocols
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Dendritic Cell Protocols
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Dendritic Cell Protocols
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Dendritic Cell Protocols
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Dendritic Cell Protocols
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Generation of Humanized Mice for Analysis of Human Dendritic Cells.
Attention for Chapter 16: Dendritic Cell Protocols
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Dendritic Cell Protocols
Chapter number 16
Book title
Dendritic Cell Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3606-9_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3604-5, 978-1-4939-3606-9
Authors

Vu Manh, Thien-Phong, Dalod, Marc, Thien-Phong Vu Manh, Marc Dalod

Editors

Elodie Segura, Nobuyuki Onai

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) are immune sentinels of the body and play a key role in the orchestration of the communication between the innate and the adaptive immune systems. DCs can polarize innate and adaptive immunity toward a variety of functions, sometimes with opposite roles in the overall control of immune responses (e.g., tolerance or immunosuppression versus immunity) or in the balance between various defense mechanisms promoting the control of different types of pathogens (e.g., antiviral versus antibacterial versus anti-worm immunity). These multiple DC functions result both from the plasticity of individual DC to exert different activities and from the existence of various DC subsets specialized in distinct functions. Functional genomics represents a powerful, unbiased, approach to better characterize these two levels of DC plasticity and to decipher its molecular regulation. Indeed, more and more experimental immunologists are generating high-throughput data in order to better characterize different states of DC based, for example, on their belonging to a specific subpopulation and/or on their exposure to specific stimuli and/or on their ability to exert a specific function. However, the interpretation of this wealth of data is severely hampered by the bottleneck of their bioinformatics analysis. Indeed, most experimental immunologists lack advanced computational or bioinformatics expertise and do not know how to translate raw gene expression data into potential biological meaning. Moreover, subcontracting such analyses is generally disappointing or financially not sustainable, since companies generally propose canonical analysis pipelines that are often unadapted for the structure of the data to analyze or for the precise type of questions asked. Hence, there is an important need of democratization of the bioinformatics analyses of gene expression profiling studies, in order to accelerate interpretation of the results by the researchers at the origin of the research project, of the data and who know best the underlying biology. This chapter will focus on the analysis of DC subset transcriptomes as measured by microarrays. We will show that simple bioinformatics procedures, applied one after the other in the framework of a pipeline, can lead to the characterization of DC subsets. We will develop two tutorials based on the reanalysis of public gene expression data. The first tutorial aims at illustrating a strategy for establishing the identity of DC subsets studied in a novel context, here their in vitro generation in cultures of human CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitors. The second tutorial aims at illustrating how to perform a posteriori bioinformatics analyses in order to evaluate the risk of contamination or of improper identification of DC subsets during preparation of biological samples, such that this information is taken into account in the final interpretation of the data and can eventually help to redesign the sampling strategy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 16%
Chemistry 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Mathematics 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2016.
All research outputs
#14,848,594
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,700
of 13,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,962
of 393,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#469
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.