You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Dendritic Cell Protocols
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 19 |
| Book title |
Dendritic Cell Protocols
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3606-9_19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3604-5, 978-1-4939-3606-9
|
| Authors |
Egawa, Gyohei, Kabashima, Kenji, Gyohei Egawa, Kenji Kabashima M.D., Ph.D., Kenji Kabashima |
| Editors |
Elodie Segura, Nobuyuki Onai |
| Abstract |
Varieties of cells orchestrate immune responses. To capture such dynamic phenomena, intravital imaging is an important technique, and it may provide substantial information that is not available using conventional histological analyses. Multiphoton microscopy enables the direct, three-dimensional, and minimally invasive imaging of biological samples with high spatiotemporal resolution, and it has now become the leading method for in vivo imaging studies. Here we describe a basic method for in vivo imaging of dendritic cells (DCs) in the mouse ear skin using multiphoton microscopy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,371,100
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,351
of 13,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,938
of 393,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#545
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.