You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Computational Science – ICCS 2009
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 9 |
Book title |
Computational Science – ICCS 2009
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, May 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-01970-8_9 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-201969-2, 978-3-64-201970-8
|
Authors |
Nikhil Laghave, Masha Sosonkina, Pieter Maris, James P. Vary, Laghave, Nikhil, Sosonkina, Masha, Maris, Pieter, Vary, James P. |
Editors |
Gabrielle Allen, Jarosław Nabrzyski, Edward Seidel, Geert Dick van Albada, Jack Dongarra, Peter M. A. Sloot |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,486,067
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,487
of 8,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,923
of 108,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.