↓ Skip to main content

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Studied by NMR Spectroscopy

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Studied by NMR Spectroscopy'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Back to the Future: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Bioinformatics Studies on Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Structure and Dynamics of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 NMR Methods for the Study of Instrinsically Disordered Proteins Structure, Dynamics, and Interactions: General Overview and Practical Guidelines
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Ensemble Calculation for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Using NMR Parameters
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 NMR Spectroscopic Studies of the Conformational Ensembles of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Recombinant Intrinsically Disordered Proteins for NMR: Tips and Tricks.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Biophysical Methods to Investigate Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Avoiding an "Elephant and Blind Men" Situation.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Application of SAXS for the Structural Characterization of IDPs
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Bioinformatics Approaches for Predicting Disordered Protein Motifs
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Towards Understanding Protein Disorder In-Cell
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 The Protein Ensemble Database
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Order and Disorder in the Replicative Complex of Paramyxoviruses.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Druggability of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Beta Amyloid Hallmarks: From Intrinsically Disordered Proteins to Alzheimer's Disease.
Attention for Chapter 13: Druggability of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Druggability of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Chapter number 13
Book title
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Studied by NMR Spectroscopy
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20164-1_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-920163-4, 978-3-31-920164-1
Authors

Joshi, Priyanka, Vendruscolo, Michele, Isabella C. Felli, Roberta Pierattelli, Priyanka Joshi, Michele Vendruscolo

Abstract

Although the proteins in all the current major classes considered to be druggable are folded in their native states, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are becoming attractive candidates for therapeutic intervention by small drug-like molecules. IDPs are challenging targets because they exist as ensembles of structures, thereby making them unsuitable for standard rational drug design approaches, which require the knowledge of the three-dimensional structure of the proteins to be drugged. As we review in this chapter, several different small molecule strategies are currently under investigation to target IDPs, including: (i) to stabilise IDPs in their natively disordered states, (ii) to inhibit interactions with ordered or disordered protein partners, and (iii) to induce allosteric inhibition. In this context, biophysical techniques, including in particular nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) coupled with molecular dynamics simulations and chemoinformatics approaches, are increasingly used to characterize the structural ensembles of IDPs and the specific interactions that they make with their binding partners. By analysing the results of recent studies, we describe the main structural features that may render IDPs druggable, and describe techniques that can be used for drug discovery programs focused on IDPs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 27%
Researcher 13 23%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 27%
Chemistry 14 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Physics and Astronomy 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,306,690
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,971
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,965
of 273,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#16
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.