You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
In Vivo Protein-Protein Interaction Studies with BiFC: Conditions, Cautions, and Caveats.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 6 |
Book title |
Plant-Pathogen Interactions
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-986-4_6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-985-7, 978-1-62703-986-4
|
Authors |
Petra Boevink, Hazel McLellan, Tatyana Bukharova, Stefan Engelhardt, Paul Birch, Boevink, Petra, McLellan, Hazel, Bukharova, Tatyana, Engelhardt, Stefan, Birch, Paul |
Abstract |
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC), performed with suitable controls and the right conditions, can be a straightforward and simple method to assess protein-protein interactions accessible to anyone with basic confocal microscopy skills. It is of course not without its own potential pitfalls and requires specific controls. Here we describe its use to study the interactions between pathogen effector proteins and host proteins inside plant cells. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 44% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2015.
All research outputs
#15,315,142
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,320
of 13,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,095
of 305,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#200
of 597 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 597 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.