↓ Skip to main content

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Studied by NMR Spectroscopy

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Studied by NMR Spectroscopy'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Back to the Future: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Bioinformatics Studies on Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Structure and Dynamics of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 NMR Methods for the Study of Instrinsically Disordered Proteins Structure, Dynamics, and Interactions: General Overview and Practical Guidelines
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Ensemble Calculation for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Using NMR Parameters
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 NMR Spectroscopic Studies of the Conformational Ensembles of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Recombinant Intrinsically Disordered Proteins for NMR: Tips and Tricks.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Biophysical Methods to Investigate Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Avoiding an "Elephant and Blind Men" Situation.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Application of SAXS for the Structural Characterization of IDPs
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Bioinformatics Approaches for Predicting Disordered Protein Motifs
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Towards Understanding Protein Disorder In-Cell
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 The Protein Ensemble Database
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Order and Disorder in the Replicative Complex of Paramyxoviruses.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Druggability of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Beta Amyloid Hallmarks: From Intrinsically Disordered Proteins to Alzheimer's Disease.
Attention for Chapter 14: Beta Amyloid Hallmarks: From Intrinsically Disordered Proteins to Alzheimer's Disease.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Beta Amyloid Hallmarks: From Intrinsically Disordered Proteins to Alzheimer's Disease.
Chapter number 14
Book title
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Studied by NMR Spectroscopy
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20164-1_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-920163-4, 978-3-31-920164-1
Authors

Korsak, Magdalena, Kozyreva, Tatiana, Magdalena Korsak, Tatiana Kozyreva

Abstract

Beta amyloid protein (Aβ) is one of the intrinsically disordered proteins associated with neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson's, prion disease and Alzheimer's disease (AD) in particular. Although the direct involvement of Aβ peptides in AD is well documented and their aggregative ability is closely related to their neurotoxicity, the precise mechanism of the neurotoxic effects of Aβ peptides remains unclear. There is still a significant gap between the site-specific structural information and the complex structural diversity of Aβ amyloids. The description of the structural polymorphisms of Aβ amyloids can provide valuable information of the molecular basis of AD onset-progress and is essential for comprehension of the Aβ aggregation pathways, in particular its structural evolution. In this review we tried to illustrate the emerging trend of defining several human neurodegenerative disorders as syndromes of protein folding and oligomerization through the example of AD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Researcher 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Chemistry 6 11%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2015.
All research outputs
#2,821,922
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#435
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,489
of 353,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#26
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.