You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Equality of Participation Online Versus Face to Face: Condensed Analysis of the Community Forum Deliberative Methods Demonstration
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 5 |
| Book title |
Electronic Participation
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-22500-5_5 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-922499-2, 978-3-31-922500-5
|
| Authors |
Eric Showers, Nathan Tindall, Todd Davies, Showers, Eric, Tindall, Nathan, Davies, Todd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 43 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 29 | 16% |
| Decision Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 45 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,141,317
of 23,526,309 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#155
of 8,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,693
of 265,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#5
of 300 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,526,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 300 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.