You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Risk of Neurodevelopmental Disease by Paternal Aging: A Possible Influence of Epigenetic Alteration in Sperm
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 8 |
| Book title |
Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD)
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-981-10-5526-3_8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-9-81-105525-6, 978-9-81-105526-3
|
| Authors |
Ryuichi Kimura, Kaichi Yoshizaki, Noriko Osumi, Kimura, Ryuichi, Yoshizaki, Kaichi, Osumi, Noriko |
| Abstract |
Sincethe theory of DOHaD has been thrown in the spotlight, most attention has focused on environmental effects of the uterus on developing embryos/fetuses. However, the ontogenesis traces back to gametogenesis. Compared to oogenesis, spermatogenesis goes through far more cell divisions and is therefore more prone to genetic variation and epigenetic alterations. This article will mainly discuss recent findings about the effects of the advanced paternal age on the next generation, in relation to the onset of psychiatric disorders such as autism spectrum disorder. We would like to advocate for further exploration on the DOHaD theory in a wider view. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 13% |
| Psychology | 5 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,272,314
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#164
of 4,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,881
of 442,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.