↓ Skip to main content

Cell-Penetrating Peptides

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Cell-Penetrating Peptides'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Classes of Cell-Penetrating Peptides.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Cell-Penetrating Peptides
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Prediction of Cell-Penetrating Peptides
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Computer-Aided Virtual Screening and Designing of Cell-Penetrating Peptides.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Investigating Membrane Interactions and Structures of CPPs.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Determining the Effects of Membrane-Interacting Peptides on Membrane Integrity.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Study of CPP Mechanisms by Mass Spectrometry.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Methods to Study the Role of the Glycocalyx in the Uptake of Cell-Penetrating Peptides
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Toxicity, Immunogenicity, Uptake, and Kinetics Methods for CPPs
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Unraveling the Mechanisms of Peptide-Mediated Delivery of Nucleic Acids Using Electron Microscopy.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 SCARA Involvement in the Uptake of Nanoparticles Formed by Cell-Penetrating Peptides
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Protein Mimicry and the Design of Bioactive Cell-Penetrating Peptides.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Pepducins and Other Lipidated Peptides as Mechanistic Probes and Therapeutics.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Identification and Characterization of Homing Peptides Using In Vivo Peptide Phage Display.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Antimicrobial and Antiviral Applications of Cell-Penetrating Peptides
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Visualizing Actin Architectures in Cells Incubated with Cell-Penetrating Peptides.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Cell-Penetrating Peptides as Carriers for Transepithelial Drug Delivery In Vitro.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 A Pathway Toward Tumor Cell-Selective CPPs?
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 PepFects and NickFects for the Intracellular Delivery of Nucleic Acids
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 In Vitro Assays to Assess Exon Skipping in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Applications of ApoB LDLR-Binding Domain Approach for the Development of CNS-Penetrating Peptides for Alzheimer's Disease.
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 CPP-Based Delivery System for In Vivo Gene Delivery
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Application of CPPs for Brain Delivery
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Intracellular Delivery of Nanoparticles with Cell Penetrating Peptides.
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Cell-Penetrating Peptides
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Cell Penetrating Peptides for Chemical Biological Studies.
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Experiences with CPP-Based Self Assembling Peptide Systems for Topical Delivery of Botulinum Toxin.
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Applications of CPPs in Genome Modulation of Plants.
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 DNA Transfer into Animal Cells Using Stearylated CPP Based Transfection Reagent.
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Live Cell Genomics: Cell-Specific Transcriptome Capture in Live Tissues and Cells.
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Live Cell Genomics: RNA Exon-Specific RNA-Binding Protein Isolation.
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 ERRATUM TO: Methods to Study the Role of the Glycocalyx in the Uptake of Cell-Penetrating Peptides.
Attention for Chapter 30: Live Cell Genomics: Cell-Specific Transcriptome Capture in Live Tissues and Cells.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Live Cell Genomics: Cell-Specific Transcriptome Capture in Live Tissues and Cells.
Chapter number 30
Book title
Cell-Penetrating Peptides
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2806-4_30
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2805-7, 978-1-4939-2806-4
Authors

Bell, Thomas J, Eberwine, James, Thomas J. Bell, James Eberwine, Bell, Thomas J.

Editors

Ülo Langel

Abstract

The sensitivity of new transcriptomic techniques is rapidly improving to the point that single-cell molecular analysis is now becoming commonplace. However to obtain accurate transcriptome data, the initial experimental steps must strive to maintain the natural environment of cell and always get set in motion under in vivo conditions. Achieving these critical experimental parameters is technically challenging for investigators and currently the most frequently used molecular techniques experimentally commence with tissues or cells in artificial environments or under in vitro conditions. Here we review an innovative experimental approach that is called transcriptome in vivo analysis (TIVA) that was designed to overcome theses well-known limitations. The TIVA methods permit cell-specific transcriptome capture from viable intact heterogeneous tissues. Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are used to deliver multifunctional transcriptome-capture tags (TIVA tags) to the cytoplasm of the cell under in vivo conditions. The TIVA capture tag enables investigators to target and isolate cell-specific transcriptomes in their natural microenvironments. The combination of maintaining in vivo conditions and selective cell-specific transcriptome capture provides investigators with the opportunity to yield the most biologically accurate and informative transcriptome data hitherto.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Researcher 4 27%
Lecturer 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Engineering 3 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Chemistry 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,340,005
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,340
of 13,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,988
of 353,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#346
of 997 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 997 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.