↓ Skip to main content

Current Concepts in Medical Research and Practice

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 77: Hoffa’s Fat Pad Abnormality in the Development of Knee Osteoarthritis
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Hoffa’s Fat Pad Abnormality in the Development of Knee Osteoarthritis
Chapter number 77
Book title
Current Concepts in Medical Research and Practice
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/5584_2017_77
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-974149-9, 978-3-31-974150-5
Authors

Wojciech Paduszyński, Mateusz Jeśkiewicz, Paweł Uchański, Sebastian Gackowski, Marek Radkowski, Urszula Demkow, Paduszyński, Wojciech, Jeśkiewicz, Mateusz, Uchański, Paweł, Gackowski, Sebastian, Radkowski, Marek, Demkow, Urszula

Abstract

Over the past two decades, many hypotheses have been put forward to explain the cause of knee osteoarthritis. Scientific reports bring up the role of adipose tissue in the activation of the inflammatory mechanisms, which is a characteristic feature of osteoarthritis natural history. Adipose tissue produces and releases cytokines, interleukins, and growth factors by means of paracrine, endocrine, and autocrine mechanisms. Hoffa's fat pad (infrapatellar adipose tissue) plays a viable role in the initiation and progression of osteoarthritis due to its role in the activation and release of pro-inflammatory mediators. The degenerative joint disease is considered an inflammatory process. Therefore, in this article we overview the importance of Hoffa's fat pad in the development and progression of osteoarthritis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 16 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 17 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,604,390
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,329
of 4,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,626
of 421,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#333
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.