↓ Skip to main content

Current Concepts in Medical Research and Practice

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 82: Metachronous Lung Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Effects of Surgical Treatment
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Metachronous Lung Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Effects of Surgical Treatment
Chapter number 82
Book title
Current Concepts in Medical Research and Practice
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/5584_2017_82
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-974149-9, 978-3-31-974150-5
Authors

Adam Rzechonek, Piotr Błasiak, Beata Muszczyńska-Bernhard, Konrad Pawełczyk, Grzegorz Pniewski, Maciej Ornat, Jędrzej Grzegrzółka, Anna Brzecka, Rzechonek, Adam, Błasiak, Piotr, Muszczyńska-Bernhard, Beata, Pawełczyk, Konrad, Pniewski, Grzegorz, Ornat, Maciej, Grzegrzółka, Jędrzej, Brzecka, Anna

Abstract

The occurrence of a second lung tumor after surgical removal of lung cancer usually indicates a lung cancer metastasis, but sometimes a new lesion proves to be a new primary lung cancer, i.e., metachronous lung cancer. The goal of the present study was to conduct a clinical evaluation of patients with metachronous lung cancer and lung cancer metastasis, and to compare the early and distant outcomes of surgical treatment in both cancer types. There were 26 age-matched patients with lung cancer metastases and 23 patients with metachronous lung cancers, who underwent a second lung cancer resection. We evaluated the histological type of a resected cancer, the extent of thoracosurgery, the frequency of early postoperative complications, and the probability of 5-year and survival after the second operation. The findings were that metachronous lung cancer was adenocarcinoma in 52% of patients, with a different histopathological pattern from that of the primary lung cancer in 74% of patients. In both cancer groups, mechanical resections were the most common surgery type (76% of all cases), with anatomical resections such as segmentectomy, lobectomy, or pneumectomy being much rarer conducted. The incidence of early postoperative complications in metachronous lung cancer and lung cancer metastasis (30% vs. 31%, respectively) and the probability of 5-year survival after resection of either cancer tumor (60.7% vs. 50.9%, respectively) were comparable. In conclusion, patients undergoing primary lung cancer surgery require a long-term follow-up due to the risk of metastatic or metachronous lung cancer. The likelihood of metachronous lung cancer and pulmonary lung cancer metastases, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the probability of 5-year survival after resection of metachronous lung cancer or lung cancer metastasis are similar.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 40%
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Linguistics 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,951,544
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,272
of 4,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,378
of 421,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#209
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.