↓ Skip to main content

Poliovirus

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Poliovirus'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 An Introduction to Poliovirus: Pathogenesis, Vaccination, and the Endgame for Global Eradication
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Poliovirus Laboratory Based Surveillance: An Overview
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Isolation and Characterization of Enteroviruses from Clinical Samples
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Isolation and Characterization of Poliovirus in Cell Culture Systems
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Molecular Characterization of Polio from Environmental Samples: ISSP, The Israeli Sewage Surveillance Protocol
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Quality Assurance in the Polio Laboratory. Cell Sensitivity and Cell Authentication Assays
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 A Transgenic Mouse Model of Poliomyelitis
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Poliovirus
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Poliovirus
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Isolation and Characterization of Vaccine-Derived Polioviruses, Relevance for the Global Polio Eradication Initiative
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Poliovirus
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Generation of Infectious Poliovirus with Altered Genetic Information from Cloned cDNA
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Rapid Method for Engineering Recombinant Polioviruses or Other Enteroviruses
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Methods to Monitor Molecular Consistency of Oral Polio Vaccine
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Methods for the Quality Control of Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccines.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Measuring Poliovirus Antigenicity by Surface Plasmon Resonance. Application for Potency Indicating Assays
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Identification and Analysis of Antiviral Compounds Against Poliovirus
Attention for Chapter 1: An Introduction to Poliovirus: Pathogenesis, Vaccination, and the Endgame for Global Eradication
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
An Introduction to Poliovirus: Pathogenesis, Vaccination, and the Endgame for Global Eradication
Chapter number 1
Book title
Poliovirus
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3292-4_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3291-7, 978-1-4939-3292-4
Authors

Philip D. Minor, Minor, Philip D.

Abstract

Poliomyelitis is caused by poliovirus, which is a positive strand non-enveloped virus that occurs in three distinct serotypes (1, 2, and 3). Infection is mainly by the fecal-oral route and can be confined to the gut by antibodies induced either by vaccine, previous infection or maternally acquired. Vaccines include the live attenuated strains developed by Sabin and the inactivated vaccines developed by Salk; the live attenuated vaccine (Oral Polio Vaccine or OPV) has been the main tool in the Global Program of Polio eradication of the World Health Organisation. Wild type 2 virus has not caused a case since 1999 and type 3 since 2012 and eradication seems near. However most infections are entirely silent so that sophisticated environmental surveillance may be needed to ensure that the virus has been eradicated, and the live vaccine can sometimes revert to virulent circulating forms under conditions that are not wholly understood. Cessation of vaccination is therefore an increasingly important issue and inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) is playing a larger part in the end game.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 14%
Student > Master 5 9%
Researcher 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 20 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 20 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2023.
All research outputs
#15,840,957
of 25,076,138 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,691
of 14,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,041
of 405,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#433
of 1,463 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,076,138 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,463 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.