↓ Skip to main content

Poliovirus

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Poliovirus'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 An Introduction to Poliovirus: Pathogenesis, Vaccination, and the Endgame for Global Eradication
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Poliovirus Laboratory Based Surveillance: An Overview
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Isolation and Characterization of Enteroviruses from Clinical Samples
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Isolation and Characterization of Poliovirus in Cell Culture Systems
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Molecular Characterization of Polio from Environmental Samples: ISSP, The Israeli Sewage Surveillance Protocol
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Quality Assurance in the Polio Laboratory. Cell Sensitivity and Cell Authentication Assays
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 A Transgenic Mouse Model of Poliomyelitis
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Poliovirus
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Poliovirus
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Isolation and Characterization of Vaccine-Derived Polioviruses, Relevance for the Global Polio Eradication Initiative
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Poliovirus
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Generation of Infectious Poliovirus with Altered Genetic Information from Cloned cDNA
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Rapid Method for Engineering Recombinant Polioviruses or Other Enteroviruses
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Methods to Monitor Molecular Consistency of Oral Polio Vaccine
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Methods for the Quality Control of Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccines.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Measuring Poliovirus Antigenicity by Surface Plasmon Resonance. Application for Potency Indicating Assays
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Identification and Analysis of Antiviral Compounds Against Poliovirus
Attention for Chapter 4: Isolation and Characterization of Poliovirus in Cell Culture Systems
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Isolation and Characterization of Poliovirus in Cell Culture Systems
Chapter number 4
Book title
Poliovirus
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3292-4_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3291-7, 978-1-4939-3292-4
Authors

Bruce R. Thorley, Jason A. Roberts, Thorley, Bruce R., Roberts, Jason A.

Abstract

The isolation and characterization of enteroviruses by cell culture was accepted as the "gold standard" by clinical virology laboratories. Methods for the direct detection of all enteroviruses by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, targeting a conserved region of the genome, have largely supplanted cell culture as the principal diagnostic procedure. However, the World Health Organization's Global Polio Eradication Initiative continues to rely upon cell culture to isolate poliovirus due to the lack of a reliable sensitive genetic test for direct typing of enteroviruses from clinical specimens. Poliovirus is able to infect a wide range of mammalian cell lines, with CD155 identified as the primary human receptor for all three seroytpes, and virus replication leads to an observable cytopathic effect. Inoculation of cell lines with extracts of clinical specimens and subsequent passaging of the cells leads to an increased virus titre. Cultured isolates of poliovirus are suitable for testing by a variety of methods and remain viable for years when stored at low temperature.This chapter describes general procedures for establishing a cell bank and routine passaging of cell lines. While the sections on specimen preparation and virus isolation focus on poliovirus, the protocols are suitable for other enteroviruses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 31%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,822,635
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#859
of 14,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,121
of 401,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#139
of 1,466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.