↓ Skip to main content

Plant Phosphoproteomics

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Plant Phosphoproteomics'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 The Plant Kinome
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Phosphatases in plants.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Phosphoproteomics in cereals.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Screening of Kinase Substrates Using Kinase Knockout Mutants
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Phosphopeptide Profiling of Receptor Kinase Mutants
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Combining Metabolic (15)N Labeling with Improved Tandem MOAC for Enhanced Probing of the Phosphoproteome.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Kinase activity and specificity assay using synthetic peptides.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Absolute quantitation of protein posttranslational modification isoform.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Phosphorylation Stoichiometry Determination in Plant Photosynthetic Membranes
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Phosphopeptide immuno-affinity enrichment to enhance detection of tyrosine phosphorylation in plants.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 The Peptide Microarray ChloroPhos1.0: A Screening Tool for the Identification of Arabidopsis thaliana Chloroplast Protein Kinase Substrates
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Plant Protein Kinase Substrates Identification Using Protein Microarrays
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Targeted Analysis of Protein Phosphorylation by 2D Electrophoresis.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Computational phosphorylation network reconstruction: methods and resources.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Computational Identification of Protein Kinases and Kinase-Specific Substrates in Plants
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Databases for plant phosphoproteomics.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Phosphorylation Site Prediction in Plants
Attention for Chapter 2: Phosphatases in plants.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Phosphatases in plants.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Plant Phosphoproteomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2648-0_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2647-3, 978-1-4939-2648-0
Authors

Schweighofer, Alois, Meskiene, Irute, Alois Schweighofer, Irute Meskiene

Abstract

Reversible protein phosphorylation is an essential posttranslational modification mechanism executed by opposing actions of protein phosphatases and protein kinases. About 1,000 predicted kinases in Arabidopsis thaliana kinome predominate the number of protein phosphatases, of which there are only ~150 members in Arabidopsis. Protein phosphatases were often referred to as "housekeeping" enzymes, which act to keep eukaryotic systems in balance by counteracting the activity of protein kinases. However, recent investigations reveal the crucial and specific regulatory functions of phosphatases in cell signaling. Phosphatases operate in a coordinated manner with the protein kinases, to execute their important function in determining the cellular response to a physiological stimulus. Closer examination has established high specificity of phosphatases in substrate recognition and important roles in plant signaling pathways, such as pathogen defense and stress regulation, light and hormonal signaling, cell cycle and differentiation, metabolism, and plant growth. In this minireview we provide a compact overview about Arabidopsis protein phosphatase families, as well as members of phosphoglucan and lipid phosphatases, and highlight the recent discoveries in phosphatase research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 21%
Computer Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unknown 15 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,410,971
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,906
of 13,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,827
of 353,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#479
of 996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.