↓ Skip to main content

The Neuropathology of Huntington’s Disease: Classical Findings, Recent Developments and Correlation to Functional Neuroanatomy

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Widespread Brainstem Neurodegeneration in Huntington's Disease (HD).
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Widespread Brainstem Neurodegeneration in Huntington's Disease (HD).
Chapter number 7
Book title
The Neuropathology of Huntington’s Disease: Classical Findings, Recent Developments and Correlation to Functional Neuroanatomy
Published in
Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19285-7_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-919284-0, 978-3-31-919285-7
Authors

Rüb, Udo, Vonsattel, Jean Paul G, Heinsen, Helmut, Korf, Horst-Werner, Udo Rüb, Jean Paul G. Vonsattel, Helmut Heinsen, Horst-Werner Korf

Abstract

The involvement of the brainstem is still not among the established degenerative features of HD (Bruyn et al. 1979; Koeppen 1989; Lange and Aulich 1986; Oyanagi et al. 1989; Rüb et al. 2014a; Vonsattel and DiFiglia 1998; Vonsattel et al. 1985). Although some of the unexplained HD disease symptoms (e.g., oculomotor dysfunctions) also suggested degeneration of select brainstem nuclei, damage to the brainstem and its possible clinical relevance in HD has been controversially discussed for many decades (see Sects. 6.2, 6.5, and 6.6). Previous assumptions that select nuclei of the brainstem may also undergo neurodegeneration during HD (i.e., dopaminergic and GABAergic substantia nigra, auditory superior olive, lateral vestibular nucleus, precerebellar inferior olive) (Figs. 1.4, 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3) have not been revisited or taken into account by current researchers (see Chap. 1) (Bruyn et al. 1979; Bollen et al. 1986; Koeppen 1989; Kremer et al. 1992; Lange and Aulich 1986; Lange et al. 1976; Lasker and Zee 1997; Leigh et al. 1983, 1985; Oyanagi et al. 1989; Rüb et al. 2009, 2014a; Vonsattel 2008; Vonsattel and DiFiglia 1998; Vonsattel et al. 1985; Walker 2007a, b). These assumptions, however, were confirmed by recent systematic pathoanatomical investigations of serial brainstem sections stained for neuronal Nissl material (with Darrow red) and lipofuscin pigment (with aldehyde-fuchsin) of clinically diagnosed and genetically confirmed HD patients that suffered from chorea, cognitive decline, and personality changes and also showed disease signs possibly related to brainstem damage (i.e., broad-based gait, gait imbalance, dysphagia, slowed horizontal saccades, inability to start horizontal saccades without initial head thrust, slowed and saccadic smooth pursuits, falls) (Rüb et al. 2014a).

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,348,067
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#38
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,014
of 353,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.