↓ Skip to main content

The Neuropathology of Huntington’s Disease: Classical Findings, Recent Developments and Correlation to Functional Neuroanatomy

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: The Neuropathological Grading of Huntington's Disease (HD).
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Neuropathological Grading of Huntington's Disease (HD).
Chapter number 2
Book title
The Neuropathology of Huntington’s Disease: Classical Findings, Recent Developments and Correlation to Functional Neuroanatomy
Published in
Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19285-7_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-919284-0, 978-3-31-919285-7
Authors

Rüb, Udo, Vonsattel, Jean Paul G, Heinsen, Helmut, Korf, Horst-Werner, Udo Rüb, Jean Paul G. Vonsattel, Helmut Heinsen, Horst-Werner Korf

Abstract

The deleterious action of the unstable CAG repeat expansion in the Huntington's disease (HD) gene (also called IT15) located on the short arm of chromosome 4 involves widespread areas of the brain including sites of increased vulnerability or sites that are relatively resistant, but not spared (Andrew et al. 1993; Duyao et al. 1993; Myers et al. 1991; The Huntington's disease Collaborative Research Group 1993). Therefore, the intensity of the degenerative process of HD is topographically variable. The neuropathological phenotype of adult HD can be almost cryptic or outstanding within the same nucleus, but at different sites. Indeed, the expression of the degenerative process differs not only among distinct anatomical compartments, but also within specific brain compartments (e.g., cerebral cortex, white matter, striatum, pallidum, thalamus, brainstem, cerebellum), or systems (e.g., basal ganglia, limbic system) (Fig. 1.4 ) (Braak and Braak 1992a, b; Bruyn et al. 1979; De la Monte et al. 1988; Dom et al. 1976; Dunlap, 1927; Duyao et al. 1993; Estrada-Sanchez and Rebec 2013; Fennema-Notestine et al. 2004; Ferrante et al. 1987; Hedreen et al. 1991; Heinsen et al. 1992, 1994, 1996, 1999; Heinsen and Rüb 1997; Lange 1981; Lange and Aulich 1986; Lange et al. 1976; Myers et al. 1988; Rüb et al. 2013a, 2014a, b; Selemon et al. 2004; Shoulson and Young 2011; Sotrel et al. 1991; Vogt and Vogt 1920, 1942; Vonsattel 2008; Vonsattel and DiFiglia 1998; Vonsattel et al. 1985). Furthermore, the expression of the pathological phenotypes depends on a constellation of influences driven mainly by epigenetic factors, genetic modifiers, duration of symptoms, or the idiosyncratic longevity of the patients (Hodges et al. 2006; U.S.-Venezuela Collaborative Research Project and Wexler 2004). Thus, upon postmortem examination the pathological phenotypes of HD brains are more or less obvious depending on the sites or systems that are considered and on the techniques applied for assessing the brains. The involvement and the evolution of the neurodegenerative changes in the striatum (caudate nucleus, putamen), and pallidum (paleostriatum) strikingly underscore the differential regional vulnerability occurring in HD within this discrete, relatively small subregions of the brain (Fig. 1.4 ) (Birnbaum 1941; Braak and Braak 1992a, b; Bruyn et al. 1979; De la Monte et al. 1988; Dom et al. 1976; Dunlap 1927; Estrada-Sanchez and Rebec 2013; Fennema-Notestine et al. 2004; Ferrante et al. 1987; Forno and Jose 1973; Hedreen et al. 1991; Heinsen et al. 1992, 1994, 1996, 1999; Heinsen and Rüb 1997; Hodges et al. 2006; Kiesselbach 1914; Landwehrmeyer et al. 1995; Lange 1981; Lange and Aulich 1986; Lange et al. 1976; Lewy 1923; McCaughey 1961; Myers et al. 1988; Neustaedter 1933; Roos et al. 1985; Rüb et al. 2013a, b, 2014a, b; Schroeder 1931; Selemon et al. 2004; Sotrel et al. 1991; Terplan 1924; Vonsattel 2008; Vonsattel and DiFiglia 1998; Vonsattel et al. 1985).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 80%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Energy 1 20%
Neuroscience 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#13,956,905
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#25
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,376
of 353,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.