↓ Skip to main content

Mutant p53 and MDM2 in Cancer

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Mutant p53 and MDM2 in Cancer'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 p53 and Hereditary Cancer
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Alterations of p63 and p73 in Human Cancers.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Cooperation of p53 Mutations with Other Oncogenic Alterations in Cancer
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 p53: Its Mutations and Their Impact on Transcription.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Transcriptional Regulation by Mutant p53 and Oncogenesis
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 p53 Mutation in the Genesis of Metastasis.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Structural Studies on Mechanisms to Activate Mutant p53
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Mutant p53 and the Response to Chemotherapy and Radiation
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Mutant p53 and MDM2 in Cancer
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Mechanisms of Mutant p53 Stabilization in Cancer
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Crosstalk Between Mdm2, p53 and HIF1-α: Distinct Responses to Oxygen Stress and Implications for Tumour Hypoxia.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 MDM2 Overexpression, Activation of Signaling Networks, and Cell Proliferation
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 p53-Independent Effects of Mdm2
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Splice Variants of MDM2 in Oncogenesis.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Mdm2 and MdmX Involvement in Human Cancer.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Targeting p53-MDM2-MDMX Loop for Cancer Therapy.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Involvement of p53 in the Repair of DNA Double Strand Breaks: Multifaceted Roles of p53 in Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) and Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ).
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 The Role of Tumor Suppressor p53 in the Antioxidant Defense and Metabolism.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Lung Cancer Stem Cells, p53 Mutations and MDM2
Attention for Chapter 11: Crosstalk Between Mdm2, p53 and HIF1-α: Distinct Responses to Oxygen Stress and Implications for Tumour Hypoxia.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Crosstalk Between Mdm2, p53 and HIF1-α: Distinct Responses to Oxygen Stress and Implications for Tumour Hypoxia.
Chapter number 11
Book title
Mutant p53 and MDM2 in Cancer
Published in
Sub cellular biochemistry, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9211-0_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-179210-3, 978-9-40-179211-0
Authors

E Douglas Robertson, Kostyantyn Semenchenko, Bohdan Wasylyk, E. Douglas Robertson, Robertson, E. Douglas, Semenchenko, Kostyantyn, Wasylyk, Bohdan

Abstract

The E3 ubiquitin ligase Mdm2 regulates two transcription factors, p53 and HIF1α, which appear to be tailored towards different and specific roles within the cell, the DNA damage and hypoxia responses, respectively. However, evidence increasingly points towards the interplay between these factors being crucial for the regulation of cellular metabolism and survival in times of oxygen stress, which has particular relevance for tumour formation. Mdm2, p53 and HIF1α all respond to hypoxia, and intriguingly, have distinct roles depending on the level of hypoxia. The data from numerous studies across different conditions hint at the interplay between these key factors in cellular homeostasis. Here we try to weave these strands together, to create a picture of the complex tapestry of interactions that demonstrates the importance of the crosstalk between these key regulatory proteins during hypoxia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,236,620
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Sub cellular biochemistry
#295
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,836
of 305,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sub cellular biochemistry
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.