| Chapter title |
RT-QuIC Assays for Prion Disease Detection and Diagnostics
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 14 |
| Book title |
Prions
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7244-9_14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7242-5, 978-1-4939-7244-9
|
| Authors |
Christina D. Orrù, Bradley R. Groveman, Andrew G. Hughson, Matteo Manca, Lynne D. Raymond, Gregory J. Raymond, Katrina J. Campbell, Kelsie J. Anson, Allison Kraus, Byron Caughey, Orrù, Christina D., Groveman, Bradley R., Hughson, Andrew G., Manca, Matteo, Raymond, Lynne D., Raymond, Gregory J., Campbell, Katrina J., Anson, Kelsie J., Kraus, Allison, Caughey, Byron |
| Abstract |
In coping with prion diseases, it is important to have tests that are practical enough for routine applications in medicine, agriculture, wildlife biology, and research, yet sensitive enough to detect minimal amounts of infectivity. Real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) assays have evolved to the point where they fulfill these criteria in applications to various human and animal prion diseases. For example, RT-QuIC assays of cerebrospinal fluid and nasal brushings allow for highly sensitive (77-97%) and specific (99-100%) identification of human sCJD patients. Recent improvements have markedly enhanced sensitivity and reduced the assay time required for many samples to a matter of hours rather than days. By combining analyses of cerebrospinal fluid and nasal brushings, diagnostic sensitivities and specificities of nearly 100% can be achieved. RT-QuIC assays are based on prion-seeded amyloid fibril formation by recombinant prion protein (rPrP(Sen)) in multiwell plates using a Thioflavin T fluorescence readout. Here we describe our current RT-QuIC methodologies as well as technical considerations in executing, troubleshooting, and adapting the assay to new strains of prions and sample types. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |