You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
The Role of Visual Analytics in Asthma Phenotyping and Biomarker Discovery
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 18 |
| Book title |
Heterogeneity in Asthma
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4614-8603-9_18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4614-8602-2, 978-1-4614-8603-9
|
| Authors |
Suresh K. Bhavnani, Justin Drake, Rohit Divekar, Bhavnani, Suresh K., Drake, Justin, Divekar, Rohit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 16% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,354,849
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,505
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,981
of 396,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#207
of 421 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 421 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.