↓ Skip to main content

Heterogeneity in Asthma

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Heterogeneity in Asthma'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Introduction to asthma and phenotyping.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Epidemiology of asthma: prevalence and burden of disease.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Heterogeneity of asthma in society.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Inhaled environmental allergens and toxicants as determinants of the asthma phenotype.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Current clinical diagnostic tests for asthma.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Management of Asthma: The Current US and European Guidelines.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Community-based interventions in asthma.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Heterogeneity of response to therapy.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Introduction to genetics and genomics in asthma: genetics of asthma.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Gene expression profiling in asthma.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Asthma epigenetics.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Overview.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Metabolomics in Asthma
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Proteomic Analysis of the Asthmatic Airway
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Measurement of the innate immune response in the airway.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Functional proteomics for the characterization of impaired cellular responses to glucocorticoids in asthma.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Analysis and Predictive Modeling of Asthma Phenotypes
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 The Role of Visual Analytics in Asthma Phenotyping and Biomarker Discovery
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Central nervous system influences in asthma.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Asthma, culture, and cultural analysis: continuing challenges.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Conclusions and future directions.
Attention for Chapter 13: Metabolomics in Asthma
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Metabolomics in Asthma
Chapter number 13
Book title
Heterogeneity in Asthma
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-8603-9_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4614-8602-2, 978-1-4614-8603-9
Authors

Bruce A Luxon, Bruce A. Luxon, Luxon, Bruce A.

Abstract

Asthma and airway inflammation are responses to infectious stimuli and the mechanisms of how they are mediated, whether by the innate or adaptive immune response systems, are complex and results in a broad spectrum of possible metabolic products. In principle, a syndrome such as asthma should have a characteristic temporal-spatial metabolic signature indicative of its current state and the constituents that caused it. Generally, the term metabolomics refers to the quantitative analysis of sets of small compounds from biological samples with molecular masses less than 1 kDa so unambiguous identification can be difficult and usually requires sophisticated instrumentation. The practical success of clinical metabolomics will largely hinge on a few key issues such as the ability to capture a readily available biofluid that can be analyzed to identify metabolite biomarkers with the required sensitivity and specificity in a cost-effective manner in a clinical setting. In this chapter, we review the current state of the metabolomics of asthma and airway inflammation with a focus on the different methods and instrumentation being used for the discovery of biomarkers in research and their future translation into the clinic as diagnostic aids for the choice of patient-specific therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2014.
All research outputs
#5,502,171
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#913
of 5,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,366
of 321,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#24
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.