Evaluative Language in Legal Professional Practice: The Case of Justification of Judicial Decisions
Book chapter (April 2022)
Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives
Overview of attention for book
Table of Contents
-
Altmetric BadgeBook Overview
-
Altmetric BadgeChapter 1 Reasoning by Consequences: Applying Different Argumentation Structures to the Analysis of Consequentialist Reasoning in Judicial Decisions
-
Altmetric BadgeChapter 2 On the Argumentum ad Absurdum in Statutory Interpretation: Its Uses and Normative Significance
-
Altmetric BadgeChapter 3 Why Precedent in Law (and Elsewhere) Is Not Totally (or Even Substantially) About Analogy
-
Altmetric BadgeChapter 4 Fallacies in Ad Hominem Arguments
-
Altmetric BadgeChapter 5 The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion
-
Altmetric BadgeChapter 6 Strategic Maneuvering with the Argumentative Role of Legal Principles in the Case of the “Unworthy Spouse”
-
Altmetric BadgeChapter 7 Legal Argumentation and the Normativity of Legal Norms
-
Altmetric BadgeChapter 8 Weighing and Balancing in the Light of Deliberation and Expression
-
Altmetric BadgeChapter 9 Construction or Reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law
-
Altmetric BadgeChapter 10 The Argument from Psychological Typology for a Mild Separation Between the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification
-
Altmetric BadgeChapter 11 Constitutive Rules and Coherence in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Extensive and Restrictive Interpretation
-
Altmetric BadgeChapter 12 Is Balancing a Method of Rational Justification sui generis ?
-
Altmetric BadgeChapter 13 Arguing on Facts: Truth, Trials and Adversary Procedures
Attention for Chapter 3:
Why Precedent in Law (and Elsewhere) Is Not Totally (or Even Substantially) About Analogy