↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Reasoning by Consequences: Applying Different Argumentation Structures to the Analysis of Consequentialist Reasoning in Judicial Decisions
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 On the Argumentum ad Absurdum in Statutory Interpretation: Its Uses and Normative Significance
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Why Precedent in Law (and Elsewhere) Is Not Totally (or Even Substantially) About Analogy
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Fallacies in Ad Hominem Arguments
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Strategic Maneuvering with the Argumentative Role of Legal Principles in the Case of the “Unworthy Spouse”
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Legal Argumentation and the Normativity of Legal Norms
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Weighing and Balancing in the Light of Deliberation and Expression
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Construction or Reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 The Argument from Psychological Typology for a Mild Separation Between the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Constitutive Rules and Coherence in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Extensive and Restrictive Interpretation
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Is Balancing a Method of Rational Justification sui generis ?
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Arguing on Facts: Truth, Trials and Adversary Procedures
Attention for Chapter 10: The Argument from Psychological Typology for a Mild Separation Between the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Summary Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Argument from Psychological Typology for a Mild Separation Between the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification
Chapter number 10
Book title
Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives
Published by
Springer, Dordrecht, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4670-1_10
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-074669-5, 978-9-40-074670-1
Authors

Marko Novak

View on publisher site
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 67%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 33%

This page is provided by Altmetric.