You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Chapter title |
Why Precedent in Law (and Elsewhere) Is Not Totally (or Even Substantially) About Analogy
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 3 |
| Book title |
Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives
|
| Published by |
Springer, Dordrecht, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-94-007-4670-1_3 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-9-40-074669-5, 978-9-40-074670-1
|
| Authors |
Frederick Schauer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 29% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 9 | 38% |
| Psychology | 5 | 21% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |