↓ Skip to main content

Epstein Barr Virus Volume 2

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 13: Non-human Primate Lymphocryptoviruses: Past, Present, and Future
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Non-human Primate Lymphocryptoviruses: Past, Present, and Future
Chapter number 13
Book title
Epstein Barr Virus Volume 2
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-22834-1_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-922833-4, 978-3-31-922834-1
Authors

Janine Mühe, Fred Wang, Mühe, Janine, Wang, Fred

Abstract

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) orthologues from non-human primates (NHPs) have been studied for nearly as long as EBV itself. Cross-reactive sera and DNA hybridization studies provided the first glimpses of the closely related herpesviruses that belonged to the same gamma-1 herpesvirus, or lymphocryptovirus, genus, as EBV. Over the years, detailed molecular and sequence analyses of LCVs that infect humans and other NHPs revealed similar colinear genome structures and homologous viral proteins expressed during latent and lytic infection. Despite these similarities, experimental infection of NHPs with EBV did not result in acute symptoms or persistent infection as observed in humans, suggesting some degree of host species restriction. Genome sequencing and a molecular clone of an LCV isolate from naturally infected rhesus macaques combined with domestic colonies of LCV-naïve rhesus macaques have opened the door to a unique experimental animal model that accurately reproduces the normal transmission, acute viremia, lifelong persistence, and immune responses found in EBV-infected humans. This chapter will summarize the advances made over the last 50 years in our understanding of LCVs that naturally infect both Old and New World NHPs, the recent, groundbreaking developments in the use of rhesus macaques as an animal model for EBV infection, and how NHP LCVs and the rhLCV animal model can advance future EBV research and the development of an EBV vaccine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#22,758,767
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#637
of 715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,512
of 362,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#35
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.