You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Analysis of Chewing Sounds for Dietary Monitoring
UbiComp 2005: Ubiquitous Computing
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2005
Oliver Amft, Mathias Stäger, Paul Lukowicz, Gerhard Tröster
Michael Beigl, Stephen Intille, Jun Rekimoto, Hideyuki Tokuda
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||41||41%|
|Student > Master||11||11%|
|Student > Bachelor||7||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||8||8%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||2||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2015.
All research outputs
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
of 8,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 139,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.