↓ Skip to main content

Zic family

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 16: Deregulation of ZIC Family Members in Oncogenesis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Deregulation of ZIC Family Members in Oncogenesis
Chapter number 16
Book title
Zic family
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-7311-3_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-107310-6, 978-9-81-107311-3
Authors

Rob Houtmeyers, Jabob Souopgui, Sabine Tejpar

Abstract

In the last decade, the amount of investigations on the involvement of ZIC genes in the cancer field have exponentially expanded. In most cancer types, promoter methylation leads to silenced ZIC family members, but specific subsets of patients clearly show increased expression of one or head-to-head located ZIC genes in the respective tumor tissue. It is unclear at this stage how these transcription factors contribute to tumorigenesis, but the potential implications in pathways that are most frequently mutated in cancer such as the canonical Wnt, TGF-beta, and STAT-3 pathway are evident. By exploring well-established developmental models, researchers were able to position ZIC genes not only as classical transcription factors but also as cofactors of chromatin remodeling complexes that are crucial for maintenance of the cell but also during differentiation and maturation of ZIC-expressing tissues in vivo. The translation of this obtained evidence to the cancer field will be challenging but will indisputably lead to a better understanding how the factors can contribute to the tumor development in the given subsets of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,376,243
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,106
of 4,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,510
of 442,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#80
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.