You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Measurement of Lysophosphatidic Acid and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate by Liquid Chromatography-Coupled Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 55 |
Book title |
Sphingosine-1-Phosphate
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/7651_2017_55 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7412-2, 978-1-4939-7413-9
|
Authors |
Maria P. Kraemer, Suchismita Halder, Susan S. Smyth, Andrew J. Morris |
Abstract |
Lysophosphatidic acids and sphingosine-1-phosphate are bioactive lipids that regulate diverse cellular and physiological processes through actions that are largely mediated by cell surface receptors. The roles played by these lipids in multiple disease processes make the enzymes and receptors involved in their synthesis, inactivation, and signaling attractive targets for pharmacological therapies. In this chapter we describe methods for sensitive accurate quantitation of LPA and S1P levels in biological fluids using liquid chromatography-coupled electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
Psychology | 1 | 10% |
Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,929,042
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,288
of 13,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,727
of 317,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#101
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.