↓ Skip to main content

Sphingosine-1-Phosphate

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Sphingosine-1-Phosphate'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Sphingosine-1-Phosphate (S1P) Signaling in Neural Progenitors
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Maintenance of Human Embryonic Stem Cells by Sphingosine-1-Phosphate and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Measuring Sphingosine-1-Phosphate/Protein Interactions with the Kinetic Exclusion Assay
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Cleanup Method for Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Sphingosine- and Ceramide-1-Phosphate in Blood and Solid Tissue Using a Phosphate Capture Molecule
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 3D Stacked Construct: A Novel Substitute for Corneal Tissue Engineering
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Analysis of S1P Receptor Expression by Uterine Immune Cells Using Standardized Multi-parametric Flow Cytometry
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 A Rapid Fluorescence Assay for Measuring Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Transporter Activity in Erythrocytes
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 S1P Synergizes with Wall Shear Stress and Other Angiogenic Factors to Induce Endothelial Cell Sprouting Responses
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 41 An Improved Isoform-Selective Assay for Sphingosine Kinase 1 Activity
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 42 Methods for Analyzing Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Signaling in Human and Mouse Primary Mast Cells
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 43 Ceramide and S1P Signaling in Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 44 Immunohistochemical Detection of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate and Sphingosine Kinase-1 in Human Tissue Samples and Cell Lines
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 51 In Vitro Methods to Study the Modulation of Migration and Invasion by Sphingosine-1-Phosphate
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 55 Measurement of Lysophosphatidic Acid and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate by Liquid Chromatography-Coupled Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Attention for Chapter 55: Measurement of Lysophosphatidic Acid and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate by Liquid Chromatography-Coupled Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Measurement of Lysophosphatidic Acid and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate by Liquid Chromatography-Coupled Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Chapter number 55
Book title
Sphingosine-1-Phosphate
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/7651_2017_55
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7412-2, 978-1-4939-7413-9
Authors

Maria P. Kraemer, Suchismita Halder, Susan S. Smyth, Andrew J. Morris

Abstract

Lysophosphatidic acids and sphingosine-1-phosphate are bioactive lipids that regulate diverse cellular and physiological processes through actions that are largely mediated by cell surface receptors. The roles played by these lipids in multiple disease processes make the enzymes and receptors involved in their synthesis, inactivation, and signaling attractive targets for pharmacological therapies. In this chapter we describe methods for sensitive accurate quantitation of LPA and S1P levels in biological fluids using liquid chromatography-coupled electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,929,042
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,288
of 13,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,727
of 317,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#101
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.