↓ Skip to main content

Biological Small Angle Scattering: Techniques, Strategies and Tips

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Biological Small Angle Scattering: Techniques, Strategies and Tips'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Small Angle Scattering: Historical Perspective and Future Outlook
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Sample and Buffer Preparation for SAXS
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Considerations for Sample Preparation Using Size-Exclusion Chromatography for Home and Synchrotron Sources
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 How to Analyze and Present SAS Data for Publication
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Designing and Performing Biological Solution Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Contrast Variation Experiments on Multi-component Assemblies
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 SAS-Based Structural Modelling and Model Validation
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Structural Characterization of Highly Flexible Proteins by Small-Angle Scattering
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 What Can We Learn from Wide-Angle Solution Scattering?
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 SAS-Based Studies of Protein Fibrillation
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 High Resolution Distance Distributions Determined by X-Ray and Neutron Scattering
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 A Successful Combination: Coupling SE-HPLC with SAXS
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Applications of SANS to Study Membrane Protein Systems
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Hybrid Applications of Solution Scattering to Aid Structural Biology
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A Practical Guide to iSPOT Modeling: An Integrative Structural Biology Platform
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Small Angle Scattering for Pharmaceutical Applications: From Drugs to Drug Delivery Systems
Attention for Chapter 9: SAS-Based Studies of Protein Fibrillation
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
SAS-Based Studies of Protein Fibrillation
Chapter number 9
Book title
Biological Small Angle Scattering: Techniques, Strategies and Tips
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-6038-0_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-106037-3, 978-9-81-106038-0
Authors

Carlotta Marasini, Bente Vestergaard, Marasini, Carlotta, Vestergaard, Bente

Abstract

Protein fibrillation is associated with a number of fatal amyloid diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases). From a structural point of view, the aggregation process starts from an ensemble of native states that convert into transiently formed oligomers, higher order assemblies and protofibrils and, finally, fibrils. The different species exist in equilibrium in solution leading to a high degree of sample heterogeneity. It is impossible to physically isolate any single species for structural analysis: separation will alter the equilibrium and potentially cause structural changes.Small angle scattering is an optimal method for structural studies of the fibrillation process in order to further the knowledge of the associated diseases. The recorded scattering data include the scattering contribution of all the species in solution and must be decomposed to enable structural modeling of the individual components involved during the fibrillation, notably without physical separation of the species. In this chapter we explain how to optimize a small angle scattering analysis of the fibrillation process and the basic principles behind analysis of the data. We include several practical tips and highlight existing reports, exemplifying the wealth of information that can be derived from the method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 33%
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,454,971
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,987
of 4,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,211
of 421,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#414
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.