Chapter title |
Small Angle Scattering: Historical Perspective and Future Outlook
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 1 |
Book title |
Biological Small Angle Scattering: Techniques, Strategies and Tips
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-981-10-6038-0_1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-9-81-106037-3, 978-9-81-106038-0
|
Authors |
Thomas M. Weiss, Weiss, Thomas M. |
Abstract |
Small angle scattering (SAS) is a powerful and versatile tool to elucidate the structure of matter at the nanometer scale. Recently, the technique has seen a tremendous growth of applications in the field of structural molecular biology. Its origins however date back to almost a century ago and even though the methods potential for studying biological macromolecules was realized already early on, it was only during the last two decades that SAS gradually became a major experimental technique for the structural biologist. This rise in popularity and application was driven by the concurrence of different key factors such as the increased accessibility to high quality SAS instruments enabled by the growing number of synchrotron facilities and neutron sources established around the world, the emerging need of the structural biology community to study large multi-domain complexes and flexible systems that are hard to crystalize, and in particular the development and availability of data analysis software together with the overall access to computational resources powerful enough to run them. Today, SAS is an established and widely used tool for structural studies on bio-macromolecules. Given the potential offered by the next generation X-ray and neutron sources as well as the development of new, innovative approaches to collect and analyze solution scattering data, the application of SAS in the field of structural molecular biology will certainly continue to thrive in the years to come. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 36% |
Germany | 1 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Ghana | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 24% |
Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
Researcher | 1 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 5 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 18% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Philosophy | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |