↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of Implantation and Establishment of Pregnancy in Mammals

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Implantation and Establishment of Pregnancy in Human and Nonhuman Primates
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Implantation and Establishment of Pregnancy in Human and Nonhuman Primates
Chapter number 10
Book title
Regulation of Implantation and Establishment of Pregnancy in Mammals
Published in
Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15856-3_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-915855-6, 978-3-31-915856-3
Authors

Ren-Wei Su, Asgerally T. Fazleabas, Su, Ren-Wei, Fazleabas, Asgerally T.

Abstract

Implantation and the establishment of pregnancy are critical for the propagation of the species, but yet remain the limiting steps in human and primate reproduction. Successful implantation requires a competent blastocyst and a receptive endometrium during a specific window of time during the menstrual cycle to initiate the bilateral communication required for the establishment of a successful pregnancy. This chapter provides an overview of these processes and discusses the molecular mechanisms associated with implantation of the blastocyst and decidualization of the uterus in primates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Student > Master 10 8%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 45 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 47 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,885,813
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#2
of 88 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,947
of 360,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.