↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Bioinformatics

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Clinical Bioinformatics'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 From the Phenotype to the Genotype via Bioinformatics
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Production and Analytic Bioinformatics for Next-Generation DNA Sequencing
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Analyzing the Metabolome
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Statistical Perspectives for Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS)
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Bioinformatics Challenges in Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS).
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Studying cancer genomics through next-generation DNA sequencing and bioinformatics.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Using Bioinformatics Tools to Study the Role of microRNA in Cancer
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Chromosome Microarrays in Diagnostic Testing: Interpreting the Genomic Data
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Bioinformatics Approach to Understanding Interacting Pathways in Neuropsychiatric Disorders
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Pathogen Genome Bioinformatics
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Setting up next-generation sequencing in the medical laboratory.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Managing incidental findings in exome sequencing for research.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Approaches for Classifying DNA Variants Found by Sanger Sequencing in a Medical Genetics Laboratory
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Designing algorithms for determining significance of DNA missense changes.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Clinical Bioinformatics
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Natural language processing in biomedicine: a unified system architecture overview.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Candidate gene discovery and prioritization in rare diseases.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Computer-Aided Drug Designing
Attention for Chapter 17: Candidate gene discovery and prioritization in rare diseases.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Candidate gene discovery and prioritization in rare diseases.
Chapter number 17
Book title
Clinical Bioinformatics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0847-9_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0846-2, 978-1-4939-0847-9
Authors

Jegga AG, Anil G. Jegga

Abstract

A rare or orphan disorder is any disease that affects a small percentage of the population. Most genes and pathways underlying these disorders remain unknown. High-throughput techniques are frequently applied to detect disease candidate genes. The speed and affordability of sequencing following recent technological advances while advantageous are accompanied by the problem of data deluge. Furthermore, experimental validation of disease candidate genes is both time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, several computational approaches have been developed to identify the most promising candidates for follow-up studies. Based on the guilt by association principle, most of these approaches use prior knowledge about a disease of interest to discover and rank novel candidate genes. In this chapter, a brief overview of some of the in silico strategies for candidate gene prioritization is provided. To demonstrate their utility in rare disease research, a Web-based computational suite of tools that use integrated heterogeneous data sources for ranking disease candidate genes is used to demonstrate how to run typical queries using this system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Researcher 6 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,389,490
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,871
of 13,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,186
of 226,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#41
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.