↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Bioinformatics

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Clinical Bioinformatics'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 From the Phenotype to the Genotype via Bioinformatics
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Production and Analytic Bioinformatics for Next-Generation DNA Sequencing
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Analyzing the Metabolome
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Statistical Perspectives for Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS)
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Bioinformatics Challenges in Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS).
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Studying cancer genomics through next-generation DNA sequencing and bioinformatics.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Using Bioinformatics Tools to Study the Role of microRNA in Cancer
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Chromosome Microarrays in Diagnostic Testing: Interpreting the Genomic Data
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Bioinformatics Approach to Understanding Interacting Pathways in Neuropsychiatric Disorders
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Pathogen Genome Bioinformatics
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Setting up next-generation sequencing in the medical laboratory.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Managing incidental findings in exome sequencing for research.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Approaches for Classifying DNA Variants Found by Sanger Sequencing in a Medical Genetics Laboratory
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Designing algorithms for determining significance of DNA missense changes.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Clinical Bioinformatics
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Natural language processing in biomedicine: a unified system architecture overview.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Candidate gene discovery and prioritization in rare diseases.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Computer-Aided Drug Designing
Attention for Chapter 13: Approaches for Classifying DNA Variants Found by Sanger Sequencing in a Medical Genetics Laboratory
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Approaches for Classifying DNA Variants Found by Sanger Sequencing in a Medical Genetics Laboratory
Chapter number 13
Book title
Clinical Bioinformatics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0847-9_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0846-2, 978-1-4939-0847-9
Authors

Cheong, Pak Leng, Caramins, Melody, Pak Leng Cheong, Melody Caramins

Abstract

Diagnostic applications of DNA sequencing technologies present a powerful tool for the clinical management of patients. Applications range from better diagnostic classification to identification of therapeutic options, prediction of drug response and toxicity, and carrier testing. Although the advent of massively parallel sequencing technologies has increased the complexity of clinical interpretation of sequence variants by an order of magnitude, the annotation and interpretation of the clinical effects of identified genomic variants remain a challenge regardless of the sequencing technologies used to identify them. Here, we survey methodologies which assist in the diagnostic classification of DNA variants and propose a practical decision analytic protocol to assist in the classification of sequencing variants in a clinical setting. The methods include database queries, software tools for protein consequence, evolutionary conservation and pathogenicity prediction, familial segregation, case-control studies, and literature review. These methods are deliberately pragmatic as diagnostic constraints of clinically useful turnaround times generally preclude obtaining evidence from in vivo or in vitro functional experiments for variant assessment. Clinical considerations require that variant classification is stringent and rigorous, as misinterpretation may lead to inappropriate clinical consequences; thus, multiple parameters and lines of evidence are considered to determine potential biological significance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 36%
Researcher 3 21%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Mathematics 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,865
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,085
of 227,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#48
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.