↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Bioinformatics

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Clinical Bioinformatics'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 From the Phenotype to the Genotype via Bioinformatics
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Production and Analytic Bioinformatics for Next-Generation DNA Sequencing
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Analyzing the Metabolome
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Statistical Perspectives for Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS)
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Bioinformatics Challenges in Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS).
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Studying cancer genomics through next-generation DNA sequencing and bioinformatics.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Using Bioinformatics Tools to Study the Role of microRNA in Cancer
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Chromosome Microarrays in Diagnostic Testing: Interpreting the Genomic Data
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Bioinformatics Approach to Understanding Interacting Pathways in Neuropsychiatric Disorders
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Pathogen Genome Bioinformatics
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Setting up next-generation sequencing in the medical laboratory.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Managing incidental findings in exome sequencing for research.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Approaches for Classifying DNA Variants Found by Sanger Sequencing in a Medical Genetics Laboratory
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Designing algorithms for determining significance of DNA missense changes.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Clinical Bioinformatics
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Natural language processing in biomedicine: a unified system architecture overview.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Candidate gene discovery and prioritization in rare diseases.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Computer-Aided Drug Designing
Attention for Chapter 5: Bioinformatics Challenges in Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS).
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Bioinformatics Challenges in Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS).
Chapter number 5
Book title
Clinical Bioinformatics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0847-9_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0846-2, 978-1-4939-0847-9
Authors

De R, Bush WS, Moore JH, Rishika De, William S. Bush, Jason H. Moore, De, Rishika, Bush, William S., Moore, Jason H.

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are a powerful tool for investigators to examine the human genome to detect genetic risk factors, reveal the genetic architecture of diseases and open up new opportunities for treatment and prevention. However, despite its successes, GWAS have not been able to identify genetic loci that are effective classifiers of disease, limiting their value for genetic testing. This chapter highlights the challenges that lie ahead for GWAS in better identifying disease risk predictors, and how we may address them. In this regard, we review basic concepts regarding GWAS, the technologies used for capturing genetic variation, the missing heritability problem, the need for efficient study design especially for replication efforts, reducing the bias introduced into a dataset, and how to utilize new resources available, such as electronic medical records. We also look to what lies ahead for the field, and the approaches that can be taken to realize the full potential of GWAS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 105 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 21%
Computer Science 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 22 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2014.
All research outputs
#13,071,205
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,292
of 13,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,556
of 228,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#20
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,353 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.