↓ Skip to main content

The Plastic Brain

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: What Is Neural Plasticity?
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
14 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
What Is Neural Plasticity?
Chapter number 1
Book title
The Plastic Brain
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-62817-2_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-962815-8, 978-3-31-962817-2
Authors

Rommy von Bernhardi, Laura Eugenín-von Bernhardi, Jaime Eugenín, Bernhardi, Rommy, Bernhardi, Laura Eugenín-von, Eugenín, Jaime, Bernhardi, Rommy von

Abstract

"Neural plasticity" refers to the capacity of the nervous system to modify itself, functionally and structurally, in response to experience and injury. As the various chapters in this volume show, plasticity is a key component of neural development and normal functioning of the nervous system, as well as a response to the changing environment, aging, or pathological insult. This chapter discusses how plasticity is necessary not only for neural networks to acquire new functional properties, but also for them to remain robust and stable. The article also reviews the seminal proposals developed over the years that have driven experiments and strongly influenced concepts of neural plasticity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 350 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 65 19%
Student > Master 46 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Student > Postgraduate 14 4%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 124 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 69 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 7%
Psychology 15 4%
Other 49 14%
Unknown 130 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#516,469
of 25,911,277 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#61
of 5,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,674
of 424,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#7
of 495 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,911,277 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 495 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.