↓ Skip to main content

The Plastic Brain

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 13: Progenitors in the Ependyma of the Spinal Cord: A Potential Resource for Self-Repair After Injury
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Progenitors in the Ependyma of the Spinal Cord: A Potential Resource for Self-Repair After Injury
Chapter number 13
Book title
The Plastic Brain
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-62817-2_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-962815-8, 978-3-31-962817-2
Authors

Nicolás Marichal, Cecilia Reali, María Inés Rehermann, Omar Trujillo-Cenóz, Raúl E. Russo

Abstract

Traumatic injury of the spinal cord leads to devastating conditions that affect ~2.5 million people worldwide. This is because the mammalian spinal cord reacts to injury with only limited endogenous repair. Functional restoration requires the replacement of lost cells, the growth and navigation of regenerating axons on a permissive scaffold and axon re-myelination. The manipulation of endogenous spinal stem cells is regarded as a potential strategy to restore function. For this type of therapy it is necessary to determine the molecular and functional mechanisms regulating the proliferation, migration and differentiation of adult spinal progenitors. The spinal cord of animal models in which self-repair normally occurs may provide some clues. Salamanders, some fish and turtles regenerate their spinal cord after massive injury, achieving substantial functional recovery. This regeneration is orchestrated by progenitors that line the central canal (CC). Although mammals have lost the ability for self-repair, some cells in the CC react to injury by proliferating and migrating toward the lesion, where most become astrocytes in the core of the scar. Thus, CC-contacting progenitors in mammals have "latent" programs for endogenous repair of the spinal cord. Progenitor-like cells in the CC are functionally organized in lateral and midline domains, with heterogeneous molecular and membrane properties that represent targets for modulation. Understanding the mechanisms by which CC-can be manipulated will give valuable clues for endogenous spinal cord repair leading to successful functional recovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,482,347
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,514
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,334
of 421,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#235
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.