↓ Skip to main content

The Plastic Brain

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 14: IKD Current in Cold Transduction and Damage-Triggered Cold Hypersensitivity
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
IKD Current in Cold Transduction and Damage-Triggered Cold Hypersensitivity
Chapter number 14
Book title
The Plastic Brain
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-62817-2_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-962815-8, 978-3-31-962817-2
Authors

Alejandro González, Gaspar Herrera, Gonzalo Ugarte, Carlos Restrepo, Ricardo Piña, María Pertusa, Patricio Orio, Rodolfo Madrid

Abstract

In primary sensory neurons of the spinal and trigeminal somatosensory system, cold-sensitivity is strongly dependent on the functional balance between TRPM8 channels, the main molecular entity responsible for the cold-activated excitatory current, and Shaker-like Kv1.1-1.2 potassium channels, the molecular counterpart underlying the excitability brake current IKD. This slow-inactivating outward K(+) current reduces the excitability of cold thermoreceptor neurons increasing their thermal threshold, and prevents unspecific activation by cold of neurons of other somatosensory modalities. Here we examine the main biophysical properties of this current in primary sensory neurons, its central role in cold thermotransduction, and its contribution to alterations in cold sensitivity triggered by peripheral nerve damage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#12,762,934
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,704
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,287
of 421,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#144
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.