↓ Skip to main content

The Plastic Brain

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: Neural Network Reconfigurations: Changes of the Respiratory Network by Hypoxia as an Example
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Neural Network Reconfigurations: Changes of the Respiratory Network by Hypoxia as an Example
Chapter number 12
Book title
The Plastic Brain
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-62817-2_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-962815-8, 978-3-31-962817-2
Authors

Fernando Peña-Ortega

Abstract

Neural networks, including the respiratory network, can undergo a reconfiguration process by just changing the number, the connectivity or the activity of their elements. Those elements can be either brain regions or neurons, which constitute the building blocks of macrocircuits and microcircuits, respectively. The reconfiguration processes can also involve changes in the number of connections and/or the strength between the elements of the network. These changes allow neural networks to acquire different topologies to perform a variety of functions or change their responses as a consequence of physiological or pathological conditions. Thus, neural networks are not hardwired entities, but they constitute flexible circuits that can be constantly reconfigured in response to a variety of stimuli. Here, we are going to review several examples of these processes with special emphasis on the reconfiguration of the respiratory rhythm generator in response to different patterns of hypoxia, which can lead to changes in respiratory patterns or lasting changes in frequency and/or amplitude.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 2 18%
Social Sciences 2 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Materials Science 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,957,541
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,272
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,428
of 421,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#209
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.