Chapter title |
A Meta-analysis of Brain Mechanisms of Placebo Analgesia: Consistent Findings and Unanswered Questions
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 3 |
Book title |
Placebo
|
Published in |
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-662-44519-8_3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-66-244518-1, 978-3-66-244519-8
|
Authors |
Lauren Y Atlas, Tor D Wager, Lauren Y. Atlas, Tor D. Wager, Atlas, Lauren Y., Wager, Tor D. |
Abstract |
Placebo treatments reliably reduce pain in the clinic and in the lab. Because pain is a subjective experience, it has been difficult to determine whether placebo analgesia is clinically relevant. Neuroimaging studies of placebo analgesia provide objective evidence of placebo-induced changes in brain processing and allow researchers to isolate the mechanisms underlying placebo-based pain reduction. We conducted formal meta-analyses of 25 neuroimaging studies of placebo analgesia and expectancy-based pain modulation. Results revealed that placebo effects and expectations for reduced pain elicit reliable reductions in activation during noxious stimulation in regions often associated with pain processing, including the dorsal anterior cingulate, thalamus, and insula. In addition, we observed consistent reductions during painful stimulation in the amygdala and striatum, regions implicated widely in studies of affect and valuation. This suggests that placebo effects are strongest on brain regions traditionally associated with not only pain, but also emotion and value more generally. Other brain regions showed reliable increases in activation with expectations for reduced pain. These included the prefrontal cortex (including dorsolateral, ventromedial, and orbitofrontal cortices), the midbrain surrounding the periaqueductal gray, and the rostral anterior cingulate. We discuss implications of these findings as well as how future studies can expand our understanding of the precise functional contributions of the brain systems identified here. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 42% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 91 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
Researcher | 9 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 18 | 20% |
Psychology | 15 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 28% |