↓ Skip to main content

Placebo

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Placebo'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Placebo and Nocebo Effects: An Introduction to Psychological and Biological Mechanisms
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Placebo, Nocebo, and Learning Mechanisms
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 A Meta-analysis of Brain Mechanisms of Placebo Analgesia: Consistent Findings and Unanswered Questions
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Placebo analgesia: cognition or perception.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Pain-related negative emotions and placebo analgesia.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 How Positive and Negative Expectations Shape the Experience of Visceral Pain
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Placebo Effects in Idiopathic and Neuropathic Pain Conditions
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Great Expectations: The Placebo Effect in Parkinson’s Disease
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 The Effects of Placebos and Nocebos on Physical Performance.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Learned Placebo Responses in Neuroendocrine and Immune Functions
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Placebo Responses on Cardiovascular, Gastrointestinal, and Respiratory Organ Functions
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Placebo and nocebo effects in itch and pain.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Clinical and ethical implications of placebo effects: enhancing patients' benefits from pain treatment.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Traditional and Innovative Experimental and Clinical Trial Designs and Their Advantages and Pitfalls
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Lessons to be Learned from Placebo Arms in Psychopharmacology Trials.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 The Emperor's New Drugs: Medication and Placebo in the Treatment of Depression.
Attention for Chapter 16: The Emperor's New Drugs: Medication and Placebo in the Treatment of Depression.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Emperor's New Drugs: Medication and Placebo in the Treatment of Depression.
Chapter number 16
Book title
Placebo
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-44519-8_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-66-244518-1, 978-3-66-244519-8
Authors

Kirsch I, Irving Kirsch, Kirsch, Irving

Abstract

Antidepressants are supposed to work by fixing a chemical imbalance, specifically, a lack of serotonin in the brain. Indeed their supposed effectiveness is the primary evidence for the chemical imbalance theory. But analyses of the published data and the unpublished data that were hidden by the drug companies reveal that most (if not all) of the benefits are due to the placebo effect. Some antidepressants increase serotonin levels, some decrease it, and some have no effect at all on serotonin. Nevertheless, they all show the same therapeutic benefit. Even the small statistical difference between antidepressants and placebos may be an enhanced placebo effect, due to the fact that most patients and doctors in clinical trials successfully break blind. The serotonin theory is as close to any theory in the history of science having been proved wrong. Instead of curing depression, popular antidepressants may induce a biological vulnerability making people more likely to become depressed in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 24%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,672,643
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#58
of 701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,462
of 270,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.