↓ Skip to main content

Placebo

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Placebo'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Placebo and Nocebo Effects: An Introduction to Psychological and Biological Mechanisms
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Placebo, Nocebo, and Learning Mechanisms
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 A Meta-analysis of Brain Mechanisms of Placebo Analgesia: Consistent Findings and Unanswered Questions
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Placebo analgesia: cognition or perception.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Pain-related negative emotions and placebo analgesia.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 How Positive and Negative Expectations Shape the Experience of Visceral Pain
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Placebo Effects in Idiopathic and Neuropathic Pain Conditions
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Great Expectations: The Placebo Effect in Parkinson’s Disease
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 The Effects of Placebos and Nocebos on Physical Performance.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Learned Placebo Responses in Neuroendocrine and Immune Functions
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Placebo Responses on Cardiovascular, Gastrointestinal, and Respiratory Organ Functions
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Placebo and nocebo effects in itch and pain.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Clinical and ethical implications of placebo effects: enhancing patients' benefits from pain treatment.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Traditional and Innovative Experimental and Clinical Trial Designs and Their Advantages and Pitfalls
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Lessons to be Learned from Placebo Arms in Psychopharmacology Trials.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 The Emperor's New Drugs: Medication and Placebo in the Treatment of Depression.
Attention for Chapter 15: Lessons to be Learned from Placebo Arms in Psychopharmacology Trials.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Lessons to be Learned from Placebo Arms in Psychopharmacology Trials.
Chapter number 15
Book title
Placebo
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-44519-8_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-66-244518-1, 978-3-66-244519-8
Authors

Doering BK, Rief W, Petrie KJ, Doering, Bettina K., Rief, Winfried, Petrie, Keith J., Bettina K. Doering, Winfried Rief, Keith J. Petrie

Editors

Fabrizio Benedetti, Paul Enck, Elisa Frisaldi, Manfred Schedlowski

Abstract

Large placebo effects are typically reported in clinical drug trials and evidence suggests placebo effects have increased over time. The diminishing drug-placebo difference calls into question the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments and provides a challenge to prove the effectiveness of new medications. This chapter discusses explanations for the increasing placebo effect. It highlights the contribution of spontaneous remission to the improvement in placebo groups, but focuses particularly on the role of patient and clinician expectations. Certain characteristics of the trial design can influence the formation of patient expectations and, subsequently, true placebo responses. Side effects in clinical trials may also contribute inadvertently to placebo responses. Side effects after starting medication can inform participants about their allocation to an active treatment group. Thus, they may enhance expectations of improvement and contribute to nonspecific effects in clinical trials. It is argued that specific and nonspecific effects interact in drug groups of clinical trials. This interaction influences drug-placebo differences in clinical trials (i.e., trial sensitivity). Future research should aim to identify which patients will respond best to drugs and those who may be better treated with placebos.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 22%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,381,794
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#498
of 645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,256
of 245,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.