↓ Skip to main content

Placebo

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Placebo'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Placebo and Nocebo Effects: An Introduction to Psychological and Biological Mechanisms
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Placebo, Nocebo, and Learning Mechanisms
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 A Meta-analysis of Brain Mechanisms of Placebo Analgesia: Consistent Findings and Unanswered Questions
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Placebo analgesia: cognition or perception.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Pain-related negative emotions and placebo analgesia.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 How Positive and Negative Expectations Shape the Experience of Visceral Pain
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Placebo Effects in Idiopathic and Neuropathic Pain Conditions
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Great Expectations: The Placebo Effect in Parkinson’s Disease
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 The Effects of Placebos and Nocebos on Physical Performance.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Learned Placebo Responses in Neuroendocrine and Immune Functions
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Placebo Responses on Cardiovascular, Gastrointestinal, and Respiratory Organ Functions
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Placebo and nocebo effects in itch and pain.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Clinical and ethical implications of placebo effects: enhancing patients' benefits from pain treatment.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Traditional and Innovative Experimental and Clinical Trial Designs and Their Advantages and Pitfalls
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Lessons to be Learned from Placebo Arms in Psychopharmacology Trials.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 The Emperor's New Drugs: Medication and Placebo in the Treatment of Depression.
Attention for Chapter 3: A Meta-analysis of Brain Mechanisms of Placebo Analgesia: Consistent Findings and Unanswered Questions
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Meta-analysis of Brain Mechanisms of Placebo Analgesia: Consistent Findings and Unanswered Questions
Chapter number 3
Book title
Placebo
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-44519-8_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-66-244518-1, 978-3-66-244519-8
Authors

Lauren Y Atlas, Tor D Wager, Lauren Y. Atlas, Tor D. Wager, Atlas, Lauren Y., Wager, Tor D.

Abstract

Placebo treatments reliably reduce pain in the clinic and in the lab. Because pain is a subjective experience, it has been difficult to determine whether placebo analgesia is clinically relevant. Neuroimaging studies of placebo analgesia provide objective evidence of placebo-induced changes in brain processing and allow researchers to isolate the mechanisms underlying placebo-based pain reduction. We conducted formal meta-analyses of 25 neuroimaging studies of placebo analgesia and expectancy-based pain modulation. Results revealed that placebo effects and expectations for reduced pain elicit reliable reductions in activation during noxious stimulation in regions often associated with pain processing, including the dorsal anterior cingulate, thalamus, and insula. In addition, we observed consistent reductions during painful stimulation in the amygdala and striatum, regions implicated widely in studies of affect and valuation. This suggests that placebo effects are strongest on brain regions traditionally associated with not only pain, but also emotion and value more generally. Other brain regions showed reliable increases in activation with expectations for reduced pain. These included the prefrontal cortex (including dorsolateral, ventromedial, and orbitofrontal cortices), the midbrain surrounding the periaqueductal gray, and the rostral anterior cingulate. We discuss implications of these findings as well as how future studies can expand our understanding of the precise functional contributions of the brain systems identified here.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Master 15 16%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 18 20%
Psychology 15 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 26 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,182,672
of 25,529,543 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#77
of 687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,147
of 319,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,529,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.