You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Extracellular Vesicle Isolation and Analysis by Western Blotting
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 12 |
| Book title |
Extracellular Vesicles
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7253-1_12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7251-7, 978-1-4939-7253-1
|
| Authors |
Emma J. K. Kowal, Dmitry Ter-Ovanesyan, Aviv Regev, George M. Church, Kowal, Emma J. K., Ter-Ovanesyan, Dmitry, Regev, Aviv, Church, George M. |
| Abstract |
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are released by mammalian cells and are thought to be important mediators of intercellular communication. There are many methods for isolating EVs from cell culture media, but the most popular methods involve purification based on ultracentrifugation . Here, we provide a detailed protocol for isolating EVs by differential ultracentrifugation and analyzing EV proteins (such as the tetraspanins CD9 , CD63 and CD81 ) by western blotting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 187 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 56 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 66 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,773,987
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#945
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,388
of 421,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#108
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.