You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
CRISPR/Cas9 in the Chicken Embryo
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 7 |
Book title |
Avian and Reptilian Developmental Biology
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7216-6_7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7215-9, 978-1-4939-7216-6
|
Authors |
Valérie Morin, Nadège Véron, Christophe Marcelle, Morin, Valérie, Véron, Nadège, Marcelle, Christophe |
Abstract |
Genome editing is driving a revolution in the biomedical sciences that carries the promise for future treatments of genetic diseases. The CRISPR/Cas9 system of RNA-guided genome editing has been successfully applied to modify the genome of a wide spectrum of organisms. We recently showed that this technique can be combined with in vivo electroporation to inhibit the function of genes of interest in somatic cells of the developing chicken embryo. We present here a simplified version of the previously described technique that leads to effective gene loss-of-function. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 3 | 16% |
Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 16% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 47% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 26% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,931,166
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,719
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,275
of 421,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#416
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.