You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Reconstitution of Membrane Proteins in Liposomes
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 14 |
| Book title |
Membrane Protein Structure and Function Characterization
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7151-0_14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7149-7, 978-1-4939-7151-0
|
| Authors |
Alice Verchère, Isabelle Broutin, Martin Picard |
| Abstract |
Membrane protein reconstitution in liposomes is an invaluable technique to study numerous properties of membrane proteins in vitro. Kinetics, substrate specificity, and protein-protein interaction of membrane proteins can be investigated once they are embedded in the liposome bilayer. Both protocols described here aim to investigate the efflux pump MexA-MexB-OprM from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a proteins complex embedded in both membranes of this Gram-negative bacteria. This tri-partite system, which by-passes the periplams, is involved in antibiotic resistance. First, we describe a protocol to study MexB, the actual transporter, and second we propose an alternate protocol where the tripartite system is investigated as a whole. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 242 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 25% |
| Researcher | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 80 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 28 | 11% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 54 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,565,641
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,952
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,367
of 421,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#693
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.