↓ Skip to main content

Heterogeneity in Asthma

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Heterogeneity in Asthma'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Introduction to asthma and phenotyping.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Epidemiology of asthma: prevalence and burden of disease.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Heterogeneity of asthma in society.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Inhaled environmental allergens and toxicants as determinants of the asthma phenotype.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Current clinical diagnostic tests for asthma.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Management of Asthma: The Current US and European Guidelines.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Community-based interventions in asthma.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Heterogeneity of response to therapy.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Introduction to genetics and genomics in asthma: genetics of asthma.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Gene expression profiling in asthma.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Asthma epigenetics.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Overview.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Metabolomics in Asthma
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Proteomic Analysis of the Asthmatic Airway
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Measurement of the innate immune response in the airway.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Functional proteomics for the characterization of impaired cellular responses to glucocorticoids in asthma.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Analysis and Predictive Modeling of Asthma Phenotypes
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 The Role of Visual Analytics in Asthma Phenotyping and Biomarker Discovery
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Central nervous system influences in asthma.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Asthma, culture, and cultural analysis: continuing challenges.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Conclusions and future directions.
Attention for Chapter 14: Proteomic Analysis of the Asthmatic Airway
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Proteomic Analysis of the Asthmatic Airway
Chapter number 14
Book title
Heterogeneity in Asthma
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-8603-9_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4614-8602-2, 978-1-4614-8603-9
Authors

John E. Wiktorowicz, Mohammad Jamaluddin, Wiktorowicz JE, Jamaluddin M, Wiktorowicz, John E., Jamaluddin, Mohammad

Abstract

Proteomic investigations in general utilize varied technologies for sample preparation, separations, quantification, protein identification, and biological rationalization. Their applications range from pure discovery and mechanistic studies to biomarker discovery/verification/validation. In each specific case, the analytical strategy to be implemented is tailored to the type of sample that serves as the target of the investigations. Proteomic investigations take into consideration sample complexity, the cellular heterogeneity (particularly from tissues), the potential dynamic range of the protein and peptide abundance within the sample, the likelihood of posttranslational modifications (PTM), and other important factors that might influence the final output of the study. We describe the sample types typically used for proteomic investigations into the biology of asthma and review the most recent related publications with special attention to those that deal with the unique airway samples such as bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALF), epithelial lining fluid and cells (ELF), induced sputum (IS), and exhaled breath condensate (EBC). Finally, we describe the newest proteomics approaches to sample preparation of the unique airway samples, BALF and IS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 19%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,193,746
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,091
of 4,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,643
of 305,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#69
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.