Chapter title |
Dependence on NIRS Source-Detector Spacing of Cytochrome c Oxidase Response to Hypoxia and Hypercapnia in the Adult Brain
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 47 |
Book title |
Oxygen Transport to Tissue XXXV
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4614-7411-1_47 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4614-7256-8, 978-1-4614-7411-1
|
Authors |
Christina Kolyva, Arnab Ghosh, Ilias Tachtsidis, David Highton, Martin Smith, Clare E. Elwell |
Abstract |
Transcranial near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) provides an assessment of cerebral oxygen metabolism by monitoring concentration changes in oxidised cytochrome c oxidase Δ[oxCCO]. We investigated the response of Δ[oxCCO] to global changes in cerebral oxygen delivery at different source-detector separations in 16 healthy adults. Hypoxaemia was induced by delivery of a hypoxic inspired gas mix and hypercapnia by addition of 6 % CO2 to the inspired gases. A hybrid optical spectrometer was used to measure frontal cortex light absorption and scattering at discrete wavelengths and broadband light attenuation at 20, 25, 30 and 35 mm. Without optical scattering changes, a decrease in cerebral oxygen delivery, resulting from the reduction in arterial oxygen saturation during hypoxia, led to a decrease in Δ[oxCCO]. In contrast, Δ[oxCCO] increased when cerebral oxygen delivery increased due to increased cerebral blood flow during hypercapnia. In both cases the magnitude of the Δ[oxCCO] response increased from the detectors proximal (measuring superficial tissue layers) to the detectors distal (measuring deep tissue layers) to the broadband light source. We conclude that the Δ[oxCCO] response to hypoxia and hypercapnia appears to be dependent on penetration depth, possibly reflecting differences between the intra- and extracerebral tissue concentration of cytochrome c oxidase. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 35% |
Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
Researcher | 3 | 15% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 5 | 25% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 15% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 10% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 30% |