↓ Skip to main content

Microbial-Based Biopesticides

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: Cell Culture for Production of Insecticidal Viruses
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Cell Culture for Production of Insecticidal Viruses
Chapter number 9
Book title
Microbial-Based Biopesticides
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6367-6_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6365-2, 978-1-4939-6367-6
Authors

Steven Reid, Leslie C. L. Chan, Leila Matindoost, Charlotte Pushparajan, Gabriel Visnovsky, Reid, Steven, Chan, Leslie C. L., Matindoost, Leila, Pushparajan, Charlotte, Visnovsky, Gabriel

Editors

Travis R. Glare, Maria E. Moran-Diez

Abstract

While large-scale culture of insect cells will need to be conducted using bioreactors up to 10,000 l scale, many of the main challenges for cell culture-based production of insecticidal viruses can be studied using small-scale (20-500 ml) shaker/spinner flasks, either in free suspension or using microcarrier-based systems. These challenges still relate to the development of appropriate cell lines, stability of virus strains in culture, enhancing virus yields per cell, and the development of serum-free media and feeds for the desired production systems. Hence this chapter presents mainly the methods required to work with and analyze effectively insect cell systems using small-scale cultures. Outlined are procedures for quantifying cells and virus and for establishing frozen cells and virus stocks. The approach for maintaining cell cultures and the multiplicity of infection (MOI) and time of infection (TOI) parameters that should be considered for conducting infections are discussed.The methods described relate, in particular, to the suspension culture of Helicoverpa zea and Spodoptera frugiperda cell lines to produce the baculoviruses Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedrovirus, HearNPV, and Anticarsia gemmatalis multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus, AgMNPV, respectively, and the production of the nonoccluded Oryctes nudivirus, OrNV, using an adherent coleopteran cell line.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,922,551
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,465
of 13,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,090
of 400,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#271
of 1,459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,521 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.